Volume 4 No. 3, July 2009

Review of Colorectal Cancer at King Abdulaziz University Hospital in Saudi Arabia

Wael Tashkandi & Abdulrahman Ahmed Meccawy.

Surgical department, King Abdulaziz university hospital, Jeddah, K.S.A
Tanta Med. Sc. J 2009; 4(3):83-92
ICID: 907313 Article type: Original articleIC™ Value: 4.54

 

bstract provided by Publisher   
Background/Aim: To detect outcomes of colorectal carcinoma patients of different Duke stage (A, B, C & D) in patients who had undergone different management options (Surgery, Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy). Patients & Methods: Open label, national study for 163 colorectal carcinoma patients in Saudi Arabia. Enrolled patients were observed to determine clinical symptoms and risk factors. Investigations and Duke staging were done to determine best suitable method of management (surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy). Tumor sample was analyzed histopathologically to determine cell type and grade. Finally prognosis of each case is reported. Results: 163 patients were enrolled; 58% of them were males, 31% were Saudi. 4 (3%) of patients were Duke A, 26 (20%) Duke B, 40 (30%) Duke C and 62 (47%) were Duke D. 25 (19%) were subjected to surgery only, 17 (13%) had chemotherapy only, 2 (2%) had radiotherapy only, 32 (25%) had surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 26 (20%) had surgery and chemotherapy while 28 (22%) had chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Duke A, B and to a little extent C were more significantly associated with Surgery alone or combined with other management options for colorectal carcinoma (100% of Duke A cases, 80% of Duke B and 77% of Duke C compared to only 39% of Duke D cases) (p value = 0.0002). On the other hand, Chemotherapy and radiotherapy (alone or in combination with surgery) were homogenously distributed in different Duke Stages with no statistical difference (p value > 0.05). Prognosis of Duke A, B and C was significantly much better than Duke D (100% of Duke A cases become free after therapy, 70% of Duke B and 44% of Duke C compared to only 3% of Duke D cases) (p value = 0.0000). 74% of Duke D cases died compared to 26% of Duke C, 20% of Duke B and 0% of Duke A. Prognosis was not significantly different among different management options (free cases are 42% of patients who undergone surgery, 27% of chemotherapy and 32% of radiotherapy) (p value = 0.6078). Conclusion: The more advanced Duke stage of colorectal carcinoma, the more probability to go for chemo or radiotherapy (no surgery) and the worst prognosis (death, metastasis and recurrence).

ICID 907313